Couscous, organic URTEKRAM, 500 g

Couscous, organic URTEKRAM, 500 g

500 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

All: couscous
100 g and 500 g
Nutrition taken from open internet sources, not from the store label.
376kcal
1573 kJ / 376 kcal
Whole pack (500 g)
1880 kcal
Fat
2 g
6% of energy
Carbohydrates
64 g
80% of energy
Proteins
11 g
14% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 500 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 500 g
Energy 1573 kJ / 376 kcal
1880 kcal
94% RI
Fat 2 g
10 g
14% RI
of which saturates 0.3 g
1.5 g
8% RI
Carbohydrate 64 g
320 g
123% RI
of which sugars 1.8 g
9 g
10% RI
Protein 11 g
55 g
110% RI
Fibre 9.8 g
49 g
Salt 0.02 g
0.1 g
2% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

Estimated from the ingredients (AI), not the label · 2026-10

A 79
Excellent
79 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Energy −4
Raises the score
  • Protein +4
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

2.9 g
Protein / 100 kcal
3%
Sugar of carbs
15%
Saturated of fat
Largest share first

1 ingredient · No additives

Tap an ingredient to see every product that contains it.

How many calories are in Couscous, organic URTEKRAM, 500 g?
100 g – 376 kcal. 1 pack (500 g) ≈ 1880 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 11 g, fat 2 g, carbohydrate 64 g.
Is Couscous, organic URTEKRAM, 500 g a healthy choice?
Health grade A (79 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-07-23

Show all (13) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.