Quinoa, organic Urtekram, 350 g

Quinoa, organic Urtekram, 350 g

350 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Quinoa seeds ALVO, 400 g 363 kcal · 100 g more fruit & veg Compare → A 96
All: quinoa
100 g and 350 g
368kcal
1541 kJ / 368 kcal
Whole pack (350 g)
1288 kcal
Fat
6,1 g
15% of energy
Carbohydrates
64,2 g
70% of energy
Proteins
14,1 g
15% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 350 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 350 g
Energy 1541 kJ / 368 kcal
1288 kcal
64% RI
Fat 6.1 g
21 g
31% RI
of which saturates 0.7 g
2.4 g
12% RI
Carbohydrate 64.2 g
225 g
86% RI
of which sugars 5 g
18 g
19% RI
Protein 14.1 g
49 g
99% RI
Fibre 7 g
25 g
Salt 0.05 g
0.2 g
3% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

A 82
Excellent
82 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Sugars −1
  • Energy −4
Raises the score
  • Protein +6
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

3.8 g
Protein / 100 kcal
8%
Sugar of carbs
11%
Saturated of fat
Largest share first

1 ingredient · No additives

Tap an ingredient to see every product that contains it.

How many calories are in Quinoa, organic Urtekram, 350 g?
100 g – 368 kcal. 1 pack (350 g) ≈ 1288 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 14,1 g, fat 6,1 g, carbohydrate 64,2 g.
Is Quinoa, organic Urtekram, 350 g a healthy choice?
Health grade A (82 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-19

Show all (11) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.