Protein waffle GO FITNESS, raspberry flavor, 50 g

Protein waffle GO FITNESS, raspberry flavor, 50 g

50 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Protein waffle MY PROTEIN VANILLA, 40 g 194 kcal · 100 g 55% fewer kcal less saturated fat Compare → B 71
All: protein waffle
100 g and 50 g
429kcal
1788 kJ / 429 kcal
Whole pack (50 g)
215 kcal
Fat
23 g
46% of energy
Carbohydrates
41 g
37% of energy
Proteins
19,4 g
17% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 50 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 50 g
Energy 1788 kJ / 429 kcal
215 kcal
11% RI
Fat 23 g
12 g
16% RI
of which saturates 14.5 g
7.3 g
36% RI
Carbohydrate 41 g
21 g
8% RI
of which sugars 13.9 g
7 g
8% RI
Protein 19.4 g
9.7 g
19% RI
Salt 0.5 g
0.3 g
4% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

E 7
Very poor
7 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −2
  • Sugars −3
  • Energy −5
  • Saturates −10
Raises the score
  • Protein +7
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

4.5 g
Protein / 100 kcal
34%
Sugar of carbs
63%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Protein waffle GO FITNESS, raspberry flavor, 50 g?
100 g – 429 kcal. 1 pack (50 g) ≈ 215 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 19,4 g, fat 23 g, carbohydrate 41 g.
Is Protein waffle GO FITNESS, raspberry flavor, 50 g a healthy choice?
Health grade E (7 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-07-11

Show all (8) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.