Soft figs SEEBERGER, 200g

Soft figs SEEBERGER, 200g

200 g
D 14 Poor Lowers the score: Sugars Lowers the score: Energy
272 kcal · 100 g · 1 pack (200 g) ≈ 544 kcal

Healthier picks of the same kind

Dried soft figs 267 kcal · 100 g less sugar Compare → D 25
All: Soft figs
100 g and 200 g
272kcal
1148 kJ/ 272 kcal
Whole pack (200 g)
544 kcal
Fat
1,3 g
5% of energy
Carbohydrates
55 g
89% of energy
Proteins
3,6 g
6% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 200 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 200 g
Energy 1148 kJ/ 272 kcal
544 kcal
27% RI
Fat 1.3 g
2.6 g
4% RI
of which saturates 0.3 g
0.6 g
3% RI
Carbohydrate 55 g
110 g
42% RI
of which sugars 55 g
110 g
122% RI
Protein 3.6 g
7.2 g
14% RI
Salt 0 g
0 g
0% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

D 14
Poor
14 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Sugars −15
  • Energy −3
Raises the score
  • Protein +1
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

1.3 g
Protein / 100 kcal
100%
Sugar of carbs
23%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Soft figs SEEBERGER, 200g?
100 g – 272 kcal. 1 pack (200 g) ≈ 544 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 3,6 g, fat 1,3 g, carbohydrate 55 g.
Is Soft figs SEEBERGER, 200g a healthy choice?
Health grade D (14 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

You will see your suggestion right away; others see it once an administrator approves it.

Nutrition

Per 100 g / ml.

Ingredients

Added by a community member · 2026-08-10

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.