Wild rice, organic RAPUNZEL, 200 g

Wild rice, organic RAPUNZEL, 200 g

200 g
A 86 Excellent Lowers the score: Energy Raises the score: Protein
381 kcal · 100 g · 1 pack (200 g) ≈ 762 kcal
All: Wild rice
100 g and 200 g
381kcal
1613 kJ / 381 kcal
Whole pack (200 g)
762 kcal
Fat
1,1 g
3% of energy
Carbohydrates
74,9 g
81% of energy
Proteins
14,7 g
16% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 200 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 200 g
Energy 1613 kJ / 381 kcal
762 kcal
38% RI
Fat 1.08 g
2.2 g
3% RI
of which saturates 0.16 g
0.3 g
2% RI
Carbohydrate 74.9 g
150 g
58% RI
of which sugars 2.5 g
5 g
6% RI
Protein 14.73 g
29 g
59% RI
Fibre 6.2 g
12 g
Salt 0.02 g
0 g
1% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

A 86
Excellent
86 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Energy −4
Raises the score
  • Protein +6
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

3.9 g
Protein / 100 kcal
3%
Sugar of carbs
15%
Saturated of fat
Largest share first

1 ingredient · No additives

Tap an ingredient to see every product that contains it.

How many calories are in Wild rice, organic RAPUNZEL, 200 g?
100 g – 381 kcal. 1 pack (200 g) ≈ 762 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 14,7 g, fat 1,1 g, carbohydrate 74,9 g.
Is Wild rice, organic RAPUNZEL, 200 g a healthy choice?
Health grade A (86 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-04

Show all (3) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.