Snack mix MR. CHECK, Mexican spice flavor, 200 g

Snack mix MR. CHECK, Mexican spice flavor, 200 g

200 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Potato Chips SALLING HOL. SNACK MIX, 100 g 501 kcal · 100 g less saturated fat Compare → E 11
All: Snack mix
100 g and 200 g
533kcal
2219 kJ / 533 kcal
Whole pack (200 g)
1066 kcal
Fat
35,5 g
61% of energy
Carbohydrates
36,5 g
28% of energy
Proteins
14,5 g
11% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 200 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 200 g
Energy 2219 kJ / 533 kcal
1066 kcal
53% RI
Fat 35.5 g
71 g
101% RI
of which saturates 7.6 g
15 g
76% RI
Carbohydrate 36.5 g
73 g
28% RI
of which sugars 4.4 g
8.8 g
10% RI
Protein 14.5 g
29 g
58% RI
Salt 1.78 g
3.6 g
59% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

E 0
Very poor
0 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −8
  • Sugars −1
  • Energy −6
  • Saturates −7
Raises the score
  • Protein +6
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

2.7 g
Protein / 100 kcal
12%
Sugar of carbs
21%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Snack mix MR. CHECK, Mexican spice flavor, 200 g?
100 g – 533 kcal. 1 pack (200 g) ≈ 1066 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 14,5 g, fat 35,5 g, carbohydrate 36,5 g.
Is Snack mix MR. CHECK, Mexican spice flavor, 200 g a healthy choice?
Health grade E (0 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-19

Show all (2) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.