Roasted almonds "Sweet Chili" FOODIN, 110 g

Roasted almonds "Sweet Chili" FOODIN, 110 g

110 g
All: Roasted almonds
100 g and 110 g
537kcal
2247 kJ / 537 kcal
Whole pack (110 g)
591 kcal
Fat
46,7 g
79% of energy
Carbohydrates
6,6 g
5% of energy
Proteins
21 g
16% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 110 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 110 g
Energy 2247 kJ / 537 kcal
591 kcal
30% RI
Fat 46.7 g
51 g
73% RI
of which saturates 3.2 g
3.5 g
18% RI
Carbohydrate 6.6 g
7.3 g
3% RI
of which sugars 4.1 g
4.5 g
5% RI
Protein 21 g
23 g
46% RI
Fibre 6.3 g
6.9 g
Salt 1.4 g
1.5 g
26% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

C 64
Average
64 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −6
  • Sugars −1
  • Energy −6
  • Saturates −3
Raises the score
  • Protein +7
  • Fruit, vegetables, nuts +5
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

3.9 g
Protein / 100 kcal
62%
Sugar of carbs
7%
Saturated of fat
Largest share first

8 ingredients · No additives

Tap an ingredient to see every product that contains it.

How many calories are in Roasted almonds "Sweet Chili" FOODIN, 110 g?
100 g – 537 kcal. 1 pack (110 g) ≈ 591 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 21 g, fat 46,7 g, carbohydrate 6,6 g.
Is Roasted almonds "Sweet Chili" FOODIN, 110 g a healthy choice?
Health grade C (64 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-24

Show all (2) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.