Rice SKANĖJA THAI, 4 x 125 g

Rice SKANĖJA THAI, 4 x 125 g

500 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Organic rice HIPP with vegetables and beef, from 12 months, 250 g 75 kcal · 100 g 79% fewer kcal more fruit & veg Compare → A 100
All: rice
100 g and 500 g
355kcal
1487 kJ / 355 kcal
Whole pack (500 g)
1775 kcal
Fat
1 g
2% of energy
Carbohydrates
77,8 g
84% of energy
Proteins
12,6 g
14% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 500 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 500 g
Energy 1487 kJ / 355 kcal
1775 kcal
89% RI
Fat 1 g
5 g
7% RI
of which saturates 0,4 g
2 g
10% RI
Carbohydrate 77,8 g
389 g
150% RI
of which sugars 0,8 g
4 g
4% RI
Protein 12,6 g
63 g
126% RI
Salt 0 g
0 g
0% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

A 82
Excellent
82 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Energy −4
Raises the score
  • Protein +5
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

3.5 g
Protein / 100 kcal
1%
Sugar of carbs
40%
Saturated of fat
Largest share first

1 ingredient · No additives

Tap an ingredient to see every product that contains it.

How many calories are in Rice SKANĖJA THAI, 4 x 125 g?
100 g – 355 kcal. 1 pack (500 g) ≈ 1775 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 12,6 g, fat 1 g, carbohydrate 77,8 g.
Is Rice SKANĖJA THAI, 4 x 125 g a healthy choice?
Health grade A (82 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-20

Show all (34) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.