Peruvian maca powder, organic DIET FOOD, 200 g

Peruvian maca powder, organic DIET FOOD, 200 g

200 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

All: Peruvian maca
100 g and 200 g
289kcal
1229 kJ / 289 kcal
Whole pack (200 g)
578 kcal
Fat
0,6 g
2% of energy
Carbohydrates
61,3 g
85% of energy
Proteins
9,7 g
13% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 200 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 200 g
Energy 1229 kJ / 289 kcal
578 kcal
29% RI
Fat 0.6 g
1.2 g
2% RI
of which saturates 0.1 g
0.2 g
1% RI
Carbohydrate 61.3 g
123 g
47% RI
of which sugars 38.2 g
76 g
85% RI
Protein 9.7 g
19 g
39% RI
Fibre 0.5 g
1 g
Salt 0.25 g
0.5 g
8% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

D 25
Poor
25 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −1
  • Sugars −11
  • Energy −3
Raises the score
  • Protein +4
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

3.4 g
Protein / 100 kcal
62%
Sugar of carbs
17%
Saturated of fat
Largest share first

1 ingredient · No additives

Tap an ingredient to see every product that contains it.

How many calories are in Peruvian maca powder, organic DIET FOOD, 200 g?
100 g – 289 kcal. 1 pack (200 g) ≈ 578 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 9,7 g, fat 0,6 g, carbohydrate 61,3 g.
Is Peruvian maca powder, organic DIET FOOD, 200 g a healthy choice?
Health grade D (25 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-28

Show all (2) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.