Pearl barley VIKIS, 800 g

Pearl barley VIKIS, 800 g

800 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Pearl barley SKANĖJA, 400 g 367 kcal · 100 g more protein Compare → A 82
Pearl barley FASMA, 800 g 335 kcal · 100 g Compare → A 79
All: pearl barley
100 g and 800 g
351kcal
1505 kJ/ 351 kcal
Whole pack (800 g)
2808 kcal
Fat
1,9 g
5% of energy
Carbohydrates
75,1 g
85% of energy
Proteins
9,4 g
10% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 800 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 800 g
Energy 1505 kJ/ 351 kcal
2808 kcal
140% RI
Fat 1.9 g
15 g
22% RI
of which saturates 0.4 g
3.2 g
16% RI
Carbohydrate 75.1 g
601 g
231% RI
of which sugars 1.6 g
13 g
14% RI
Protein 9.4 g
75 g
150% RI
Salt 0 g
0 g
0% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

B 75
Good
75 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Energy −4
Raises the score
  • Protein +3
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

2.7 g
Protein / 100 kcal
2%
Sugar of carbs
21%
Saturated of fat
Largest share first

1 ingredient · No additives

Tap an ingredient to see every product that contains it.

How many calories are in Pearl barley VIKIS, 800 g?
100 g – 351 kcal. 1 pack (800 g) ≈ 2808 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 9,4 g, fat 1,9 g, carbohydrate 75,1 g.
Is Pearl barley VIKIS, 800 g a healthy choice?
Health grade B (75 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-07-18

Show all (11) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.