Organic pears, 55-65 mm, 500 g

Organic pears, 55-65 mm, 500 g

500 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

All: Organic pears
100 g and 500 g
Nutrition taken from open internet sources, not from the store label.
57kcal
238 kJ / 57 kcal
Whole pack (500 g)
285 kcal
Fat
0,1 g
1% of energy
Carbohydrates
15 g
96% of energy
Proteins
0,4 g
3% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 500 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 500 g
Energy 238 kJ / 57 kcal
285 kcal
14% RI
Fat 0.1 g
0.5 g
1% RI
of which saturates 0 g
0 g
0% RI
Carbohydrate 15 g
75 g
29% RI
of which sugars 10 g
50 g
56% RI
Protein 0.4 g
2 g
4% RI
Salt 0 g
0 g
0% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

Estimated from the ingredients (AI), not the label · 2026-10

A 89
Excellent
89 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Sugars −2
Raises the score
  • Fruit, vegetables, nuts +5
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

0.7 g
Protein / 100 kcal
67%
Sugar of carbs
0%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Organic pears, 55-65 mm, 500 g?
100 g – 57 kcal. 1 pack (500 g) ≈ 285 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 0,4 g, fat 0,1 g, carbohydrate 15 g.
Is Organic pears, 55-65 mm, 500 g a healthy choice?
Health grade A (89 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

You will see your suggestion right away; others see it once an administrator approves it.

Nutrition

Per 100 g / ml.

Ingredients

Added by a community member · 2026-07-26

Show all (18) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.