Nutrend CARBOSNACK GEL Cola with Caffeine 50 g

Nutrend CARBOSNACK GEL Cola with Caffeine 50 g

50 g
D 39 Poor Lowers the score: Sugars Lowers the score: Salt
252 kcal · 100 g · 1 pack (50 g) ≈ 126 kcal
All: Nutrend Cola
100 g and 50 g
252kcal
1069 kJ/252 kcal
Whole pack (50 g)
126 kcal
Fat
0 g
0% of energy
Carbohydrates
61,8 g
100% of energy
Proteins
0 g
0% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 50 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 50 g
Energy 1069 kJ/252 kcal
126 kcal
6% RI
Fat 0 g
0 g
0% RI
of which saturates 0 g
0 g
0% RI
Carbohydrate 61.8 g
31 g
12% RI
of which sugars 18.5 g
9.3 g
10% RI
Protein 0 g
0 g
0% RI
Fibre 0 g
0 g
Salt 0.8 g
0.4 g
7% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

D 39
Poor
39 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −3
  • Sugars −5
  • Energy −3
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

0.0 g
Protein / 100 kcal
30%
Sugar of carbs
How many calories are in Nutrend CARBOSNACK GEL Cola with Caffeine 50 g?
100 g – 252 kcal. 1 pack (50 g) ≈ 126 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 0 g, fat 0 g, carbohydrate 61,8 g.
Is Nutrend CARBOSNACK GEL Cola with Caffeine 50 g a healthy choice?
Health grade D (39 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

You will see your suggestion right away; others see it once an administrator approves it.

Nutrition

Per 100 g / ml.

Ingredients

Added by a community member · 2026-09-05

Show all (4) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.