Lasagna with beef WILLIAM SAURIN, 300 g

Lasagna with beef WILLIAM SAURIN, 300 g

300 g
B 71 Good
107 kcal · 100 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Lasagna with vegetables HIPP, 250 ml 78 kcal · 100 g 27% fewer kcal more fruit & veg Compare → A 96
Puree I LOVE ECO lasagna, from 6 months, 120 g 70 kcal · 100 g 35% fewer kcal less salt Compare → A 79
All: Lasagna
100 g and 300 g
107kcal
448 kJ/ 107 kcal
Whole pack (300 g)
321 kcal
Fat
4,9 g
42% of energy
Carbohydrates
10 g
38% of energy
Proteins
5,2 g
20% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 300 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 300 g
Energy 448 kJ/ 107 kcal
321 kcal
16% RI
Fat 4.9 g
15 g
21% RI
of which saturates 2 g
6 g
30% RI
Carbohydrate 10 g
30 g
12% RI
of which sugars 1.9 g
5.7 g
6% RI
Protein 5.2 g
16 g
31% RI
Salt 0.6 g
1.8 g
30% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

B 71
Good
71 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −2
  • Energy −1
  • Saturates −1
Raises the score
  • Protein +2
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

4.9 g
Protein / 100 kcal
19%
Sugar of carbs
41%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Lasagna with beef WILLIAM SAURIN, 300 g?
100 g – 107 kcal. 1 pack (300 g) ≈ 321 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 5,2 g, fat 4,9 g, carbohydrate 10 g.
Is Lasagna with beef WILLIAM SAURIN, 300 g a healthy choice?
Health grade B (71 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-09

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.