Functional bar EPBAR with peanut butter, 52 g

Functional bar EPBAR with peanut butter, 52 g

52 g
All: Functional bar
100 g and 52 g
605kcal
2531 kJ / 605 kcal
Whole pack (52 g)
315 kcal
Fat
54,1 g
79% of energy
Carbohydrates
24,2 g
16% of energy
Proteins
7,6 g
5% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 52 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 52 g
Energy 2531 kJ / 605 kcal
315 kcal
16% RI
Fat 54.1 g
28 g
40% RI
of which saturates 33.5 g
17 g
87% RI
Carbohydrate 24.2 g
13 g
5% RI
of which sugars 8.7 g
4.5 g
5% RI
Protein 7.6 g
4 g
8% RI
Salt 0.19 g
0.1 g
2% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

D 39
Poor
39 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Sugars −2
  • Energy −7
  • Saturates −10
Raises the score
  • Protein +3
  • Fruit, vegetables, nuts +5
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

1.3 g
Protein / 100 kcal
36%
Sugar of carbs
62%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Functional bar EPBAR with peanut butter, 52 g?
100 g – 605 kcal. 1 pack (52 g) ≈ 315 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 7,6 g, fat 54,1 g, carbohydrate 24,2 g.
Is Functional bar EPBAR with peanut butter, 52 g a healthy choice?
Health grade D (39 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

You will see your suggestion right away; others see it once an administrator approves it.

Nutrition

Per 100 g / ml.

Ingredients

Added by a community member · 2026-08-07

Show all (2) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.