Fish balls RIMI SMART in tomato sauce, 240g

Fish balls RIMI SMART in tomato sauce, 240g

240 g
C 57 Average Lowers the score: Salt Raises the score: Protein
151 kcal · 100 g · 1 pack (240 g) ≈ 362 kcal

Healthier picks of the same kind

Fish balls in tomato sauce, 240 g 159 kcal · 100 g more fruit & veg less salt Compare → B 75
All: Fish balls
100 g and 240 g
151kcal
632 kJ/ 151 kcal
Whole pack (240 g)
362 kcal
Fat
5,8 g
35% of energy
Carbohydrates
14,2 g
38% of energy
Proteins
10 g
27% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 240 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 240 g
Energy 632 kJ/ 151 kcal
362 kcal
18% RI
Fat 5.8 g
14 g
20% RI
of which saturates 1.2 g
2.9 g
14% RI
Carbohydrate 14.2 g
34 g
13% RI
of which sugars 3.3 g
7.9 g
9% RI
Protein 10 g
24 g
48% RI
Salt 1.8 g
4.3 g
72% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

C 57
Average
57 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −8
  • Energy −1
  • Saturates −1
Raises the score
  • Protein +4
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

6.6 g
Protein / 100 kcal
23%
Sugar of carbs
21%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Fish balls RIMI SMART in tomato sauce, 240g?
100 g – 151 kcal. 1 pack (240 g) ≈ 362 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 10 g, fat 5,8 g, carbohydrate 14,2 g.
Is Fish balls RIMI SMART in tomato sauce, 240g a healthy choice?
Health grade C (57 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-12

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.