Croissant with butter, 58 g

Croissant with butter, 58 g

58 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

French Croissant, 220g 274 kcal · 100 g 39% fewer kcal Compare → C 57
Croissant with almond filling, 95 g 349 kcal · 100 g 22% fewer kcal more fruit & veg Compare → C 43
Croissant with almond cream MINDAUGO KEPYKLA 400 kcal · 100 g 10% fewer kcal more fruit & veg Compare → D 39
All: Croissant
100 g and 58 g
446kcal
1871 kJ/ 446 kcal
Whole pack (58 g)
259 kcal
Fat
21 g
47% of energy
Carbohydrates
46 g
45% of energy
Proteins
8,3 g
8% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 58 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 58 g
Energy 1871 kJ/ 446 kcal
259 kcal
13% RI
Fat 21 g
12 g
17% RI
of which saturates 0.2 g
0.1 g
1% RI
Carbohydrate 46 g
27 g
10% RI
of which sugars 4.4 g
2.6 g
3% RI
Protein 8.3 g
4.8 g
10% RI
Salt 1.3 g
0.8 g
13% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

D 36
Poor
36 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −6
  • Sugars −1
  • Energy −5
Raises the score
  • Protein +3
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

1.9 g
Protein / 100 kcal
10%
Sugar of carbs
1%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Croissant with butter, 58 g?
100 g – 446 kcal. 1 pack (58 g) ≈ 259 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 8,3 g, fat 21 g, carbohydrate 46 g.
Is Croissant with butter, 58 g a healthy choice?
Health grade D (36 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-07-20

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.