Chips TALER with bananas, 135 g

Chips TALER with bananas, 135 g

135 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Organic chips, 150g 337 kcal · 100 g 11% fewer kcal less sugar Compare → A 79
Chips TALER OVEN BAKED classic, 180 g 348 kcal · 100 g less sugar less saturated fat Compare → C 64
All: chips
100 g and 135 g
378kcal
1598 kJ / 378 kcal
Whole pack (135 g)
510 kcal
Fat
5,8 g
14% of energy
Carbohydrates
71,9 g
77% of energy
Proteins
8 g
9% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 135 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 135 g
Energy 1598 kJ / 378 kcal
510 kcal
26% RI
Fat 5.8 g
7.8 g
11% RI
of which saturates 3.4 g
4.6 g
23% RI
Carbohydrate 71.9 g
97 g
37% RI
of which sugars 15.1 g
20 g
23% RI
Protein 8 g
11 g
22% RI
Salt 0.43 g
0.6 g
10% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

D 32
Poor
32 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −2
  • Sugars −4
  • Energy −4
  • Saturates −3
Raises the score
  • Protein +3
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

2.1 g
Protein / 100 kcal
21%
Sugar of carbs
59%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Chips TALER with bananas, 135 g?
100 g – 378 kcal. 1 pack (135 g) ≈ 510 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 8 g, fat 5,8 g, carbohydrate 71,9 g.
Is Chips TALER with bananas, 135 g a healthy choice?
Health grade D (32 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-07-21

Show all (10) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.