Caesar salad dressing SUSLAVIČIAUS, 300 g

Caesar salad dressing SUSLAVIČIAUS, 300 g

300 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Salad dressing WELL DONE, 100 g 29 kcal · 100 g 89% fewer kcal less salt Compare → B 75
Salad dressing KUHNE AMERICAN CAESAR, 500 ml 135 kcal · 100 g 49% fewer kcal Compare → C 43
All: salad dressing
100 g and 300 g
263kcal
1085 kJ / 263 kcal
Whole pack (300 g)
789 kcal
Fat
26 g
89% of energy
Carbohydrates
6 g
9% of energy
Proteins
1,5 g
2% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 300 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 300 g
Energy 1085 kJ / 263 kcal
789 kcal
39% RI
Fat 26 g
78 g
111% RI
of which saturates 2 g
6 g
30% RI
Carbohydrate 6 g
18 g
7% RI
of which sugars 4,1 g
12 g
14% RI
Protein 1,5 g
4.5 g
9% RI
Salt 2 g
6 g
100% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

D 29
Poor
29 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Salt −9
  • Sugars −1
  • Energy −3
  • Saturates −1
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

0.6 g
Protein / 100 kcal
68%
Sugar of carbs
8%
Saturated of fat
How many calories are in Caesar salad dressing SUSLAVIČIAUS, 300 g?
100 g – 263 kcal. 1 pack (300 g) ≈ 789 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 1,5 g, fat 26 g, carbohydrate 6 g.
Is Caesar salad dressing SUSLAVIČIAUS, 300 g a healthy choice?
Health grade D (29 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

Added by a community member · 2026-08-25

Show all (14) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.