Apricot jam SKANOVĖ, 540 g

Apricot jam SKANOVĖ, 540 g

540 g

Healthier picks of the same kind

Apricot jam without added sugar ZUEGG, 220 g 44 kcal · 100 g 78% fewer kcal less sugar Compare → B 75
Apricot jam WELL DONE, 360 g 207 kcal · 100 g Compare → D 25
All: apricot jam
100 g and 540 g
200kcal
832 kJ / 200 kcal
Whole pack (540 g)
1080 kcal
Fat
0 g
0% of energy
Carbohydrates
51 g
99% of energy
Proteins
0,3 g
1% of energy
Nutrition per 100 g and per 540 g pack
Nutrient 100 g 540 g
Energy 832 kJ / 200 kcal
1080 kcal
54% RI
Fat 0 g
0 g
0% RI
of which saturates 0 g
0 g
0% RI
Carbohydrate 51 g
275 g
106% RI
of which sugars 49 g
265 g
294% RI
Protein 0.3 g
1.6 g
3% RI
Salt 0 g
0 g
0% RI

RI – reference intake for an adult (2000 kcal).

From the product label · updated 2026-10

D 21
Poor
21 out of 100 · Judged as: food
Lowers the score
  • Sugars −14
  • Energy −2
How this is worked out

We use the Nutri-Score method: points for energy, sugar, saturated fat and salt, less points for protein, fibre and fruit and vegetable content. Drinks, oils and cheese are judged on their own scales — otherwise olive oil would look worse than a sugary drink purely for being calorie-dense.

Shops do not publish fibre, so we treat it as zero. Whole grain and pulse products may therefore score slightly lower here than the label on the packet says.

0.2 g
Protein / 100 kcal
96%
Sugar of carbs
How many calories are in Apricot jam SKANOVĖ, 540 g?
100 g – 200 kcal. 1 pack (540 g) ≈ 1080 kcal.
How much protein, fat and carbohydrate?
Per 100 g: protein 0,3 g, fat 0 g, carbohydrate 51 g.
Is Apricot jam SKANOVĖ, 540 g a healthy choice?
Health grade D (21 of 100), from its sugar, saturated fat, salt, fibre and protein.

You will see your suggestion right away; others see it once an administrator approves it.

Nutrition

Per 100 g / ml.

Ingredients

Added by a community member · 2026-09-06

Show all (5) Every store’s version of the same product

Label facts, in your feed every day

Where the sugar hides, which has the most protein, which yogurt is better – short comparisons worth saving.